Looking back at my work throughout PME 811, I believe my assignments demonstrate thoughtful
engagement with both the course readings and my own professional experience as a teacher. Many of the
concepts explored in this course—creativity, innovation, teaching, and learning—were ideas I had already
considered in my practice. However, considering these ideas through readings, discussions, and written
reflections helped me examine them more critically and connect them more clearly to broader educational
systems.
One of the biggest takeaways from this course is that innovation in education is often much more gradual
and complex than it is presented in policy or professional development initiatives. Through my blog posts
and assignments, I reflected on how educational systems frequently introduce new initiatives that
promise improvement but do not always last long enough to create meaningful change. This idea became
clearer through readings such as Cuban’s discussion of educational reform cycles, which suggests that
many reforms in education reappear over time in slightly different forms. As a teacher, this perspective
helped me better understand why experienced educators often recognize familiar patterns when new
initiatives are introduced.
Many of the course readings influenced my thinking, but several stood out in particular. Amabile’s work
on creativity helped me reflect on how classroom environments influence students’ willingness to take
risks and explore ideas. Falkenberg’s discussion of contemplative teaching encouraged me to think more
intentionally about the awareness and responsiveness required in everyday teaching decisions. I was also
particularly impacted by Madden’s discussion of Indigenous education, which highlighted how
meaningful change in education often requires deeper relational and structural shifts rather than simply
introducing new initiatives.
One area where my perspective differed slightly from the structure of the course was the role of the blog
itself. The purpose of the blog was presented as a space for reflection, but I personally felt that this
reflection was already occurring through the discussion posts and conversations with peers in OnQ.
Writing discussion posts required careful engagement with the readings and thoughtful responses to
classmates’ ideas, which often pushed my thinking further. Because a significant amount of time was
already spent analyzing articles and constructing discussion responses, I sometimes found the blog posts
to feel somewhat redundant in terms of reflective purpose. However, looking back at the blog as a
collection of reflections across the course, I can also see how it provides a record of how my thinking
developed over time.
Overall, I believe my work throughout the course demonstrates growth in how I understand the
relationship between creativity, innovation, teaching, and learning. While my core beliefs about teaching
remained consistent, the course and readings helped me think more critically about how these ideas are
influenced by broader educational systems and structures.
I believe my blog meets the Leading category because my posts connect course readings to classroom practice and reflect on how my thinking about creativity, innovation, teaching, and learning developed during the course.
Comments
Post a Comment