Skip to main content

PME 811- Innovation: Indigenous Perspectives

Both Toulouse (2008) and Madden (2015) explore how education systems have historically failed Indigenous learners and what needs to change to create more meaningful and respectful learning environments. What stood out to me most in Toulouse’s article was her emphasis on self-esteem as central to student success. She explains that Indigenous student achievement is deeply connected to whether their identity, culture, and worldview are respected and reflected in the classroom. Learning is not treated as purely academic, but as holistic, involving emotional, intellectual, spiritual, and social aspects. I’ve found this to be true in my own classroom. When students feel safe, respected, and understood, their engagement and willingness to learn changes significantly. It reinforced for me that teaching is not just about content, but about creating conditions where students feel valued and capable.

Madden builds on this idea by focusing on teacher education and the responsibility educators have to reflect on their own assumptions and practices. Her discussion of the four pedagogical pathways made me realize that this work is not about following a checklist, but about ongoing reflection and growth. I noticed strong connections between her ideas and how teaching already requires constant interpretation and adjustment. We are always observing students, refining our approach, and responding to their needs. Madden’s emphasis on questioning taken-for-granted systems helped me see that innovation in teaching is not necessarily about doing something completely new, but about rethinking whose knowledge is centered and how learning is experienced.

Both articles reshaped how I think about innovation in teaching and learning. Innovation is often framed as new programs or technology, but here it is more about shifting mindset and relationships. I’ve found that innovation can also mean slowing down, listening, and building meaningful connections with students and communities. Teaching on Sylix Land, and working in a district that prioritizes Indigenous Education Enhancement Agreements, I see how these ideas connect directly to initiatives already happening around me. Our district emphasizes relationship-building, land-based learning, and collaboration with Indigenous communities, and these readings helped me understand the deeper purpose behind that work. It is not about adding Indigenous perspectives into lessons, but about allowing Indigenous ways of knowing to shape how learning happens.

At the same time, these readings raised important questions for me. Where can the funding come from to bring Elders into schools regularly to work alongside teachers and support authentic, lived applications of Indigenous ways of learning? Elders hold knowledge that teachers cannot replicate, and their presence would make learning more meaningful and grounded. I also wonder what it would look like to center Sylix teachings specifically, rather than relying on frameworks like the Ojibwe Seven Teachings. Since learning is deeply connected to place, it seems important that students learn from the knowledge and traditions of the land they are on. Another challenge I’ve noticed is that not all teachers feel confident or comfortable with this work. How do we create empathy, understanding, and purposeful application with reluctant teachers in ways that feel supportive rather than forced?

These readings reinforced for me that meaningful engagement with Indigenous ways of knowing is not about meeting policy requirements, but about rethinking teaching as a relational, reflective, and responsive practice. It requires humility, ongoing learning, and a willingness to shift how we see knowledge and learning. More importantly, it reminded me that this work is not separate from teaching, but is part of creating classrooms where all students feel connected, respected, and capable of learning.

References:

Madden, B. (2015). Pedagogical pathways for Indigenous education with/in teacher education. Teaching and Teacher Education, 51, 1–15. 

Toulouse, P. R. (2008). Integrating Aboriginal teaching and values into the classroom. What Works? Research into Practice (Research monograph #11). Ontario Ministry of Education.

School District No. 22 (Vernon). (2023). KʷU CK̓ʷUL̓X Indigenous Education Enhancement Agreement 2023–2028.

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Why Role Reversals Still Upset the Internet

"It's just a commercial. It's just a mermaid. It's just a superhero." And yet, every time those roles are reversed—online outrage flares up. Why? By: Shannon A Disorienting Photo Series A captivating photo series published in O, The Oprah Magazine flipped familiar situations with a racial spin: a white child surrounded by Black dolls, a white servant with a Black housewife, and white salon techs serving Asian customers. Scenes meant to question the "norm". They expose how deeply we internalize who belongs where in society. A white girl looks at a row of dolls, all of whom have dark skin tones, challenging toy aisle norms. Image: Chris Buck/O, the Oprah Magazine Art? Or A Deeper Issue But this isn’t just about photography. Projects like this are not new and have always prompted broader reflections, one on a growing trend across media of role reversals in race, gender, and power. From TikTok trends to pop music, these inversions are everywhere, and almos...

PME 811-Innovation: Diversity and Inclusion in Innovation, Teaching, and Learning

  Martin, J. R. (1991). The contradiction and the challenge of the educated woman.  Women's Studies Quarterly, 19 (1/2), 6–27. Reading Martin (1991) helped me understand why education has felt rigid and limited in how it defines intelligence and success. She explains that the idea of an “educated person” was originally based on traits associated with men, such as rationality, independence, and competitiveness, while traits associated with women, such as care, connection, and emotional awareness, were seen as less valuable. Martin uses Virginia Woolf’s metaphor of crossing a bridge to explain how women entering professional fields were expected to leave parts of their identity behind in order to succeed. Her argument is not that women need to assimilate into existing systems, but that education itself must change to value what she calls the “3 Cs”—Care, Concern, and Connection—alongside logic and reason (Martin, 1991, p. 19). This article added to my understanding of innovation...